October 15, 2007

Blog Action Day

Today is Blog Action Day, a single day for all bloggers to post about one important issue, the environment. Most people think that Future House Now is a green site. It isn't. My primary focus is interesting modern homes, particularly those that are in the realm of realistic affordability for real families. But having said that, I frequently post about "green homes," and today is a good day to clarify my views on the subject.

First of all, why do I often post about green homes, even when my site is not purely focused on green issues? Well, for starters, green makes a lot of practical sense. It's laughable how much emphasis we put on greening our cars when we spend way more energy in our houses. It should be obvious every week when we take out the trash that our homes are the epicenter of our consumption habits. And I care about my family's health. I want them to live in a safe household environment, not one that is riddled with toxins and allergens.

Second, green isn't that hard to do anymore. You don't have to live in an Earthship made of tires pounded full of dirt, and old aluminum cans to be green (though that's pretty cool if you ask me). You also don't have to be an eco-warrior living off the grid in Northern California, growing all your own food and living off $10,000 worth of yearly organic produce sales. I guess what I mean is that being "green" isn't really an extreme lifestyle choice, it's part of everyday life for everyday people all over the USA. We have to stop treating green as extreme. Frankly, I think that alienates more people than it attracts. That's why I try not to overplay my green views, just as I don't downplay them either. To me, the important thing is that we're all constantly raising our awareness and incorporating green practices in our lives one little step at a time.

There are so many good ways to green any home, any style, old or new, anywhere. How about more efficient appliances, compact fluorescent light bulbs, better insulation, and low-VOC paints? These are pretty easy things that can make a big difference. How about not using those toxic cleaners in your kitchen and bathroom? Use good ol' white vinegar - it works great and is non-toxic. Inexpensive too. And great technology is here, with real strides in renewable energy being made every day. The reasons for not taking advantage of better technology for greener homes are becoming fewer and fewer. We're pretty much at the point where going green isn't about making tough choices, it's about making smart choices. The difference now isn't as much about toughness as it is about awareness.

I like to show interesting modern homes, and some of them are not particularly green. But lots of them are, in lots of different ways. Some are green just because they are compact. Some are green because they have a broad sheltering roof and good insulation. Some are green becaues they make good use of recycled materials, or new materials like steel framing that will last a long, long time without a lot of costly maintenance, and that can be recycled someday if need be. Maybe they aren't all perfect, but we can learn something from them. My site is about ideas. Some of the good ideas I like to show are about environmentally friendly homes, and some of the ideas are about other things. They're not mutually exclusive. And we have to stop thinking in those terms. Green fits with modern because they are both about good design. Good design has logic, economy and beauty all rolled into one. I see green as a part of that, not a whole unto itself.

Don't get me wrong, I don't take green for granted. I accept green as a matter of fact. That's how it should be - a natural part of life, not a radical philosophy. I view the recent mainstreaming of green as a sign that we've finally turned the corner. It won't be long now before we build the momentum to make lasting positive change. The challenges are real, but humanity, in spite of itself, is a problem solving species. We can do it.

4 comment(s):

Max said...

ok John, since your site is about the "future house," I'll let you slide on this one for now

Anonymous said...

Green IS hard to do, and it IS extreme. If you don't believe me, do this little experiment: call up ten random contractors in your local phone book and ask if they're ever done a "green" house.

One will say, "Yeah, I did one back in the 1980s."

The rest of them will either tell you that it costs twice as much and try to talk you into using a stock home plan, or hang up the phone as soon as you stutter the word "green" into the receiver.

Architecture is not built by architects - and it's especially not built by bloggers, journalists, magazine editors, or photographers, all. It's built by contractors. And contractors are lazy, under-educated, and extremely risk-averse. The guy with the hammer controls the industry. You will find a few contractors who are different, but the fact remains that there are only about 2,000 LEED-certified buildings in the United States. Sure, the world is bigger than the US, but this is a US-based blog after all.

I agree with your basic premise - that sustainability has to become something that's just part of the everyday lexicon and mental map of people for it to really become successful. But it will never become successful unless it becomes part of the everyday lexicon and...

So let's face it: unless humans completely die out or the world loses a substantial percentage of its population, sustainability is an unrealistic conception.

John Commoner said...

Wow, anonymous, I really like your comments. I totally agree that builders need to learn to build green, and not be afraid of it. And I also agree that the amount of "green" buildings that have been built are actually quite few and far between. Really, though the demand is growing, it is still small.

As for humanity, you are spot on. We are a consuming species. We have to consume air, water, food, resources for shelter, etc. just to survive. The act of building is in itself consumptive. The greenest building is the one that doesn't get built. A lot of people take the view that the better project is a remodel, using recycled materials, rather than building new.

It is fair to say "green" is still NOT the vernacular orientation. I don't know what to do to change that. I'm really not trying to disclaim my site as "green" because I do very much like to talk about sustainable homes. But on the other hand I like to also talk about other things, and I am tired of some of the criticism I occasionally get that I am (paraphrasing) "not green enough to really be green." It's ridiculous to me that some green interests seem to demand a level of purity to be part of the club. I'm not trying to be any part of any particular philosophy. I personally believe that when I talk about environmental issues I do so in a context that reflects the position most people are in - becoming aware, educating themselves, making smarter choices, slowly but steadily finding ways to be greener.

Anyway, thanks for your comment. I really do appreciate the insights.

Sage Homebuilders said...

John, just wanted to bring another project to your attention. It's a green project, but it is the modern/contemporary design that's getting it blogosphere attention here in St. Louis. Check out Kyrle Boldt's Art | House at http://www.arthousestl.com. My company, Sage Homebuilders, is the contractor on the project. We're thrilled to be part of something so progressive by St. Louis standards, and love that Kyrle's allowed us to build the project under green guidelines. Anyway, thought you might be interested.

Jason Stone
Sage Homebuilders, LLC
St. Louis, MO
http://www.sagestl.com/
http://sagestl.blogspot.com/